Controversial Cybercrime Prevention Act Suspended by Philippines Court

Last week, the government of the Philippines passed a law that caused a huge uproar among its citizens. It was a variant of the American SOPA law, one meant to police the internet under the guise of protecting children and copyright while in reality censoring free speech in a supposedly democratic nation. Today, in the wake of a massive amount of protests and public outrage, the Supreme Court of the Philippines has suspended the law. The court has enacted a temporary restraining order preventing the Cybercrime Prevention Act from going into effect in the wake of 15 different petitions being filed against it.
The problem lies in that while the law claims to be about fighting child pornography, identity theft and file sharing, there are larger issues at stake in the language. The most controversial aspect was a libel provision that seemed to indicate that citizens could be arrested for negative comments toward the police or government leveled via Facebook, Twitter or the internet in general.
Further compounding the issue was the fact that a Senator who inserted the libel provision recently was the target of internet outrage after it was documented that he lifted speeches from bloggers and the US's Robert F. Kennedy. Opponents said it was his hurt feelings that would enact a part of the law that would essentially legalize Chinese-style censorship of the Filipino people.
The fact that the law has been suspended by the court is absolutely a win for the millions in opposition, though it's not the final answer for them. The law needs to be struck down by the court, and it's unclear whether it could just be the libel provision to go, or if other controversial aspects would be banished as well. The ban on (adult) pornography and file-sharing is an assault on free speech in a different form, after all.
It's interesting to see this happening in the Philippines, as I could easily imagine a similar scenario unfolding if SOPA had somehow managed to pass in the US. It would have likely been contested for years, and inevitably made its way to our own Supreme Court. The fact that the idea actually made it into law in the Philippines shows an even greater disconnect between that nations citizens and the politicians who claim to represent them. The fact that one man can insert a provision into a law banning one of the essential tenants of free speech, the right to protest the government, says a lot about the legislature if there were enough empty suits nodding their heads to go along with such an inane idea.
Once again, laws like these arent about safeguarding the public, theyre about controlling them. Just because a nation is a democracy, that doesnt mean it cant slowly shift into a more oppressive form of government. Laws like these, should they be allowed to stand, are the first step in such a downward trend. If a Facebook post critical of the government can get you arrested, its scary to think what the next step past that would be.
Its been heartening to see the Filipino community rise up against this injustice the way they have. My post last week was flooded with comments expressing rage and disappointment in their leaders, comments which under the new law may very well have made them criminals.
Hopefully the court will see the folly of this law, and the Cybercrime Prevention Act will become as distant a memory as SOPA is here. But there will always be a next battle, a next fight, as the struggle for control over the general population is endless, and very well-funded.